Screening plants for resistance to insect pests

EntoLab is a computerized system for automated screening of plants for resistance to sucking insects. It can accurately screen many different plant lines in a high-throughput manner.

Posted by

Lucas Noldus

Published on

Wed 19 May. 2021

Topics

| Insects | EntoLab |

Screening plants for resistance to insect pests

Sucking insects, such as thrips, aphids and whiteflies, can have devastating effects in agriculture and horticulture due to both direct damage and virus transmission. Traditionally, these insect pests are controlled by repeated spraying of insecticides. However, the recent bans on neonicotinoids (neuro-active insecticides) in Europe and the United States, and health concerns about pesticides in general, are creating urgent calls for alternatives.

The loss in yield from piercing, cell-feeding insects can be greatly reduced if crops are better equipped with natural defense mechanisms. For this reason, breeding for host-plant resistance to sucking insects has gained much interest in recent years. A crucial element in the breeding process is the accurate estimation of the resistance level of segregating plant populations (crosses or accessions) and to correlate this to the genetic information (SNPs or QTLs). This requires robust phenotyping systems that can accurately screen many different plant lines in a high-throughput manner.

insect-damage-crop

Complete and automated integrated solution for insect screening

Conventional plant phenotyping methods mainly focus on costly, labor-intensive and time-consuming end-point measurements of feeding damage or insect performance (reproduction and mortality). Visual rating systems that score feeding damage often do not allow precise quantification and are sensitive to subjectivity and inconsistency of the scoring process.

EntoLab is the long-awaited solution that overcomes the limitations of conventional screening methods. Developed by Noldus Information Technology in collaboration with Wageningen Plant Research and renowned plant breeding companies, EntoLab is a novel computerized system for automated screening of plants for resistance to sucking insects.

EntoLab chamber

EntoLab has been validated in either choice or no-choice assays for different species of thrips, aphids and whitefly in various combinations on pepper, tomato, water melon, chrysanthemum, white cabbage, lily, lettuce, eggplant and bitter gourd. Evaluations are currently extended to field crops such as rice and maize and to caterpillars and plant hoppers. It has shown to deliver more accurate and more detailed insight in the behavior of herbivorous insects on different plant genotypes, with approx. 90% reduction in time and costs of screening!

Automated, high-throughput phenotyping of host-plant resistance to sucking or chewing insects will greatly aid research and the breeding process for insect-resistant crops. The unlocking of behavioral details that have often gone unnoticed will in the future lead to more insight into the environmental and genetic mechanisms that control it. Genetic improvement of commercial vegetables and ornamental crops will reduce the dependency on chemical pesticides, thus contributing to more sustainable crop production.

Case studies

Related Posts

Father’s genes affect their offspring’s future success
22 Sep animal behavior research Other (Animal)

Father’s genes affect their offspring’s future success

The early life environment of male bank voles can influence their offspring significantly. Both social stress and nutrient supply have an effect on the chances of survival for two generations.
The accuracy of measuring fish aggression by using mirror tests
18 Aug animal behavior research Other (Animal)

The accuracy of measuring fish aggression by using mirror tests

To examine the response of cichlids to their mirror image, Balzarini et al. used three sympatric species from Lake Tanganyika and did the mirror test for measuring aggression.
Dynamic winners and sluggish losers
03 Mar animal behavior research Other (Animal)

Dynamic winners and sluggish losers

We all know the phenomenon: some have it all. Look around a classroom and you see immediately who gets all the attention and who doesn’t, who are “winners”, and who are “losers”. Are we born this way, or do we learn it?