Facing the food of the future
Insects are often termed the "food of the future," as they are a healthy and more sustainable alternative to conventional protein sources. But are we ready to face this new culinary frontier?
Read More arrow_forwardStephen Ross and Katie Gillespie (2009) recorded the behavior of 338 visitors at the Regenstein African Journey in Lincoln Park Zoo using handheld computers.
Museums, zoos, theme parks, and aquariums all observe the behavior of their visitors in order to find the best ways to entertain and educate. In Timing and Tracking: Unlocking Visitor Behavior, Steven Yalowitz and Kerry Bronnenkant review the history of timing and tracking in museums and provide a detailed description of methods used to record, analyze, and report timing and tracking data.
Yalowitz and Bronnenkant explain that in the past, researchers only recorded where the visitor went (and in some of the earliest studies, they even tracked wear patterns on the carpet!)
Today, researchers record which displays visitors look at, for how long, and which paths they take to walk through the exhibition. At the same time, they describe if the visitors' expectations are met. Exhibition designers and planners are very interested in knowing if the exhibition has a good flow and whether visitors are engaging the exhibition as intended.
In terms of methodology, a lot of researchers still rely on paper-and-pencil methods to record how visitors move through exhibitions. Yalowitz and Bronnenkant found some limitations to this commonly used research method. They explain that electronic behavioral coding and analysis systems such as The Observer XT have distinct advantages over paper-and-pencil measures – they are more accurate, able to record separate times for concurrent behaviors, easy to learn, do not require data entry, and are less intrusive to visitors.
FREE TRIAL
Request a free trial and see for yourself how easy behavioral research can be!
Below I'll describe three examples of visitor behavior studies. Observational research gives insight into how visitors behave and how learnings can be improved.
Stephen Ross and Katie Gillespie (2009) recorded the behavior of 338 visitors at the Regenstein African Journey in Lincoln Park Zoo using handheld computers in order to evaluate the use of the building and educational components. They found that the use of signs and symbols differed: those in groups without children spent more of their visit engaged with signage than those with children.
Researchers from Loyola University Chicago chose a museum as the setting for their experimental and observational research. They were specifically interested in how young children experienced an exhibit. In this blog post you can learn how they designed the study.
The aim of this project was to study visitor behavior in the Living Treehouse at Zoo Atlanta. Montana Holland and colleagues from Kennesaw State University report that visitors spent significantly more time watching animals than reading signage. Limited interaction with relatively static displays may not lead to the intended change in knowledge and conservation attitudes among zoo visitors. Read more about this project in this poster presentation.
Insects are often termed the "food of the future," as they are a healthy and more sustainable alternative to conventional protein sources. But are we ready to face this new culinary frontier?
Read More arrow_forward
We live in a demanding world: the snort of an email, the squeal of a text, fare alerts, breaking news, SQUIRREL! What was I saying? Oh yes, we live in a distracted world.
Read More arrow_forward
Masson and colleagues from Université Paris-Saclay, France, designed a test kitchen to investigate food storage processes. According to them, the use of video cameras was of great value for analyzing behaviors.
Read More arrow_forwardWe'll get back to you shortly.
Please correct the following errors: